Automated Casualties

Ismail Khan, one of London’s many homeless, died today after suffering an apparent heart attack as a result of being shocked by one of the automatic defensive units used by the city’s railway network.

Installed recently to prevent vandals destroying property, or terrorists from carrying out a possible attack, the death has sparked controversy and calls by civil rights groups to have the systems re-manned and monitored by humans in order to make more accurate judgement calls.

Khan, 31, was apparently looking for somewhere to sleep when he approached the perimeter fence along the tracks near New Cross Gate. Apparently unable to speak English, and ignoring the warning signs, he paid no attention to the automatic voice warning issued by the unit.

It is unknown if he has any family, or relatives.

From a UK news report, circa 2020.

Comments

There are no comments for this fragment. Why not leave a message?

Leave a comment






Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

June 28, 2007

History Fragments: Some People Understood The Future

Written by Craig Sefton on June 27, 2007 | History Fragments

Bruce Sterling was one of them, although, like most, he was way too optimistic, caught in the gaze of pursuit of wealth and the wonders of technology. A borderless world to some, if you played by the rules, but an open-aired prison to others that couldn’t, or wouldn’t.

I gently opined to the glum congressional committee that sealing borders in a world of location-aware technology is a futile effort doomed to an ignominious defeat. Yes sir, just like digital rights management!

Anyway, fact is, a passport is redundant - even if it’s crammed full of RFID chips that howl your ID to every passing parking meter. The US should do what the Japanese do: track every foreigner’s mobile. If he does anything freaky, jump on him.

Anybody without a mobile is not any kind of danger to society. He’s a pitiful derelict. Because he’s got no phone. Duh.

He also has no email, voicemail, pager, chat client, or gaming platform. And probably no maps, guidebooks, Web browser, video player, music player, or radio. No transit tickets, payment system, biometric ID, environmental safety sensor, or Breathalyzer. No alarm clock, camera, laser scanner, navigator, pedometer, flashlight, remote control, or hi-def projector. No house key, office key, car key… Are you still with me? If you don’t have a mobile, the modern world is a seething jungle crisscrossed by electric fences crowned with barbed wire. A guy without a mobile is beyond derelict. He’s a nonperson.

From Dispatches From the Hyperlocal Future, Wired Magazine, 26th June 2007:

Too bad over two billion people are nonpersons and derelicts.

History Fragments: Art Critic Or Vandal?

Written by Craig Sefton on June 27, 2007 | History Fragments

Recent hi-tech artists who have been manipulating and planting arphids around major urban centres - reprogramming them with neo-luddite, anti-capitalist or anti-commercial art slogans, and even arranging them to form invisible digital graffiti - often cite The Splasher as being a historical inspiration in showing how it was possible to use street art to spread memes and create copycats.

The only clues left behind in the paint assaults were bold manifestoes - phrases like “destroy the museums, in the streets and everywhere” - that appeared to critique the commercialization of art.

Now it appears that there may be more than one Splasher, and those claiming responsibility for the attacks have offered additional information about themselves.

Art Critic or Vandal? ‘The Splasher’ Leaves Clues, New York Times, 27th June, 2007

History Fragments: Recycling Plastic

Written by Craig Sefton on June 27, 2007 | History Fragments

A US company is taking plastics recycling to another level - turning them back into the oil they were made from, and gas.

All that is needed, claims Global Resource Corporation (GRC), is a finely tuned microwave and - hey presto! - a mix of materials that were made from oil can be reduced back to oil and combustible gas (and a few leftovers).

Giant Microwave Turns Plastic Back To Oil, New Scientist, 26th June 2007

History Fragments: Harnessing Untapped Brain Power

Written by Craig Sefton on June 26, 2007 | History Fragments

Desney Tan, a researcher at Microsoft Research, and Pradeep Shenoy, a graduate student at the University of Washington, have devised a scheme that uses electro-encephalograph (EEG) caps to collect the brain activity of people looking at pictures of faces and nonfaces, such as horses, cars, and landscapes. The pair found that even when the subjects’ objective wasn’t to distinguish the faces from the nonfaces, their brain activity indicated that they subconsciously identified the difference. The researchers wrote software that churns through the EEG data and classifies faces and nonfaces based on the subjects’ response. When a single person viewed an image once, the system was able to identify faces with up to 72.5 percent accuracy. Results were even better using data from eight people who had viewed a particular image twice: accuracy jumped to 98 percent.

“Given that the brain is constantly processing external information,” says Tan, “we can start to use the brain as a processor.” In one scenario, he explains, pictures would be placed in people’s peripheral vision, which doesn’t require focused cognitive attention, so they could go about their daily tasks.

Human-Aided Computing, from the Technology Review, 22nd June, 2007

History Fragments: The Beginning of an Agricultural Revolution

Written by Craig Sefton on June 26, 2007 | History Fragments

Morikawa says his engineers had their breakthrough idea right there in the orange grove. They realized that the task could be divided between two robots: One would locate all the oranges, and the second would pick them. “Once you know where all the fruit is, then it becomes an easy job to calculate the most efficient way to pick it all,” says Morikawa.

[...]

The farmers are willing to pay up because they’ve been rattled by a labor shortage over the past few years — California growers tell horror stories of watching their fruit rot on the trees as they waited for the picking crews to arrive. Last fall, growers rallied in front of the U.S. Capitol, frustrated that Congress still hadn’t created a program to ease the passage of foreign guest workers across the Mexico border.

With the supply-and-demand equation uncertain, growers see the robots as a better option. “You can predict what it’s going to cost to buy a machine and maintain it,” says Baskin. “You can’t predict the bargaining that we go through with contract labor,” he says.

Farms Fund Robots to Replace Migrant Fruit Pickers, from Wired Magazine, 21st June 2007

History Fragments: Fitted Out For The Future

Written by Craig Sefton on June 25, 2007 | History Fragments

No need to worry about that family history of heart disease, because gene therapy will clear that up. You have a few friends with artificial limbs - some arms, some legs - but you’re still weighing up the pros and cons of elective replacement for yourself. Perhaps you’ll go for that exoskeleton instead? It would be fun to run, jump and lift like an Olympian

Fitted out for the future, Seamus Byrne, Sydney Morning Herald, 25th June 2007

History Fragments: Homo Cyberneticus

Written by Craig Sefton on June 25, 2007 | History Fragments

Thanks to Moore’s Law, the computer will soon think faster than the human brain, argues Hans Moravec, Research Professor at the Robotics Institute of Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, and author of several books on the evolution of robot intelligence. He’s calculated that the human brain’s current processing capacity of 100-trillion instructions per second is likely to be surpassed by computers by the year 2030. Increasingly, computers will take over more and more of the functions of the human brain, he says. They’ll replicate many of our brain pathways, perhaps evolving and learning themselves, maybe eventually even becoming self aware and conscious like Hal in ‘2001 A Space Odyssey’ and Viki in ‘I Robot’.

They’ll soon leave Homo Optimus far behind. With advances in robot technology, they’ll be fully mobile, relatively crude at first, but quickly evolving into sophisticated androids. Like the androids in ‘I Robot’, they’ll assume more and more of our daily functions. They’ll take over production of goods and services, they’ll run our corporations in a fully automated economy. They’ll reduce the value of human brain power to zero, just as the industrial revolution reduced the value of muscle power to zero centuries earlier. We humans will be left to our own devices, creatures of leisure, with no need to work. What a terrific arrangement - as long as the machines believe it’s worthwhile keeping us on. If they don’t, there could be serious trouble. They might decide they’re better off without us. If we’re both competing for the earth’s diminishing resources, it could get ugly.

If we don’t want to cede control of the planet to them, we’ll have no choice but to team up with machines and integrate with them. Not being able to beat them, we’ll be forced to join them.

In fact we’re already going down that path, argues Pearson. We’ve made artificial limbs, eyes and ears that interface directly with our nervous systems. We’ve built computers that can detect our thoughts without any connection between brain and machine. It won’t be long before a computer and a human brain can share consciousness, he says. This new species too will have a name - Homo Cyberneticus. A union of silicon on which computing power is based, and of carbon, from which organic life forms are built.

What a glorious future. Or is it? To present day humans, it sounds not so much an advance but more like a takeover of the human race by machines. So in the beginning at least, there’ll be resistance by some homo sapiens. Some will resist on the grounds of religion and ethics. Others will fear the loss of human rituals, like the Saturday night with the mates, a few beers and a shag.

But eventually we’ll have no choice. We’ll fall so far behind, we’ll be unfit for anything but an unreliable form of domestic servant, or worse, as pets. But if we don’t go along with the machines, we’ll risk dying out, just as Neanderthals died out to make way for our human ancestors, the Cro Magnons. After a couple of centuries, we’d come to our senses, and join with the machines, making homo sapiens the first species on the planet to become voluntarily extinct.

Dr. Peter Lavell, Ockham’s Razor, Human Brain: Future Upgrades, 17th June 2007

Interview with a Human: The Freedom Club

Written by Craig Sefton on June 24, 2007 | Interview Fragments

What is The Freedom Club?

We are an organisation dedicated to bringing about personal human freedom by opposing the restrictions and order that we believe are being imposed by technology upon us as individuals, and society as a whole.

We believe it is an intrinsic, basic right of every human to have a level of privacy that does not simply mean information security, as well as the right of every biological human being to not be discriminated against because they refuse to take part in cyberization or implantation, or because they simply can’t afford it.

Furthermore, we are wholly opposed to technological progress simply for the sake of profit, which benefits a wealthy few and increases the digital divide, but rather support technological progress for the benefit of mankind, rich or poor.

Since it is the existence of technology itself that is important, and not how it is used, we believe that all scientific research should not be done under the auspices of the military-industrial complex, nor under private, corporate direction, but rather through open source and transparent mechanisms that are wholly owned by the public, because we fund a large part of this research through taxes already. In other words, we believe in a democratic form of scientific research.

Read the rest of this entry »

History Fragments: The Nature of Technology

Written by Craig Sefton on June 23, 2007 | History Fragments

“[Technology] creates new possibilities for human choice and action but leaves their disposition uncertain. What its effects will be and what ends it will serve are not inherent in the technology, but depend on what man will do with technology. Technology thus makes possible a future of open-ended options … New technology creates new opportunities for men and societies and it also generates new problems for them. It has both positive and negative effects, and it usually has the two at the same time and in virtue of each other.”

– Emmanuel G. Mesthene, Program on Technology and Society, Fourth Annual Report, Harvard University, 1969

“Our conventional response to all media, namely that it is how they are used that counts, is the numb stance of the technological idiot … The effects of technology do not occur at the level of opinions or concepts, but alter sense ratios or patterns of perception steadily and without any resistance … Subliminal and docile acceptance of media impact has made them prisons without walls for their human users.”

Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media, 1964

Be the first to write a comment.

There are no tags for this fragment.